|
Ä¿ÇÇÇâÀÌ ³ª´Â *NIX
Ä¿ÇǴнº
½Ã½ºÅÛ/³×Æ®¿÷/º¸¾ÈÀ» ´Ù·ç´Â °÷
|
|
|
|
ÀÌÀü ÁÖÁ¦ º¸±â :: ´ÙÀ½ ÁÖÁ¦ º¸±â |
±Û¾´ÀÌ |
¸Þ½ÃÁö |
truefeel Ä«Æä °ü¸®ÀÚ
°¡ÀÔ: 2003³â 7¿ù 24ÀÏ ¿Ã¸° ±Û: 1277 À§Ä¡: ´ëÇѹα¹
|
¿Ã·ÁÁü: 2004.1.16 ±Ý, 1:19 pm ÁÖÁ¦: 2004³âÀº µ¥½ºÅ©Å¾ ¸®´ª½ºÀÇ ÇØ. Torvalds ÀÎÅͺä |
|
|
LinuxWorld.com.au ¿¡ Linus Torvalds ÀÎÅÍºä ±â»ç°¡ ½Ç·ÁÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
- µ¥½ºÅ©Å¾¿¡¼ ¸®´ª½º°¡ ¾ó¸¶³ª ÁøÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÏ´À³Ä?
- 2004³â °èȹ?
- ÅëÇÕµÈ HW, SW ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ä¿ëÇÒ °ÍÀΰ¡?
- ¿£ÅÍÇÁ¶óÀÌÁî¿¡¼ ¸®´ª½º´Â?
- »ó¾÷Àû SW ȸ»ç¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¹øµé¸µµÇ´Â ¿ÀǼҽºÄÚµå´Â ¾î¶»°Ô µÇ°í ÀÖ´À³Ä?
- free¿Í »ó¾÷ SW°£ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô º¸°í Àִ³Ä?
- ÃÖ±Ù SCO À̽´¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼´Â?
- OSDL¿¡¼ ¹«½¼ÀÏÀ» ÇÏ´À³Ä?
- ±×·¸´Ù¸é È£ÁÖ·Î ¿Å±æ »ý°¢?
2004³â¿¡´Â µ¥½ºÅ©Å¾ »ç¿ëÀÚ°¡ ¸¹À» °ÍÀ̶ó´Â °Í°ú
Fedora°¡ Çѵδ޳»¿¡ Ä¿³Î 2.6¹öÀüÀ» ¸±¸®ÁîÇÒ °ÍÀ̶ó´Â °Í(ÀÌ°Ô Core 2°¡ µÇ°ÚÁö¿ä.)µîÀÇ ³»¿ëµé.
¸®´©½º´Â ͏®Æ÷´Ï¾Æ »êÈ£¼¼(San Jose) Áý¿¡¼ ÀçÅñٹ«¸¦ ÇѰ¡º¾´Ï´Ù.
±×¸®°í È£ÁÖ·Î ¿Å±æ °ÍÀΰ¡¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼´Â È£ÁÖ´Â ÁÁ¾ÆÇÏÁöÁö¸¸ ¿Å±æ °èȹÀº ¾ø´Ù¶ó°í Çϳ׿ä.
¾îÂ÷ÇÇ Áý¿¡¼ ÀÏÇÏ´Ï ¾îµð¿¡ ÀÖµç »ó°ü¾ø´Ù°í.
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php?id=568003838&fp=16&fpid=0
Àοë: |
Linux breaks desktop barrier in 2004: Torvalds
Rodney Gedda , Computerworld
15/01/2004 15:43:16
This year will see Linux finally crack the lucrative desktop market as more commercial software vendors tool up and cash in on the operating system and kernel developers improve graphical interface integration says cult hero and Linux founder Linus Torvalds. Computerworld's Rodney Gedda cornered the penguin power supremo at the Linux.Conf.au in Adelaide.
Computerworld: How do you feel Linux on the desktop is progressing?
Linus Torvalds: Last year was good but I¡¯m seeing a lot more noise about it this year. The server space is easier to tackle first with any operating system as it can be applied to specific tasks such as mail serving; however, the desktop is harder to sell.
Now, the kernel and other pieces are coming together including office applications, games and Web browsers. This has made the Linux desktop interesting to commercials. Commercials tend to choose one desktop, such as KDE or GNOME (GNU Network Object Model Environment), and stick with it. There has been some confusion and rivalry that has helped its development. Right now it looks like the two are closing in on each other, for example, with Red Hat¡¯s Bluecurve interface.
I don¡¯t think X is going away as it has a powerful infrastructure and throwing it away would be stupid. And its network transparency is good. It¡¯s likely that X will be the 2D interface to a lower-level graphics system that is based on OpenGL. The Linux desktop wants to have 3D as the base and X as the interface to 2D.
The fact that X and kernel development have been separate is good; one could evolve without the other but DRI (Direct Rendering Infrastructure) has made them not completely independent. As a developer, having the two separate is good, because different people are good at developing for each.
CW: Any plans for 2004?
LT: I¡¯ve never had much of a plan for the direction of Linux as I react to outside pressure. This year there will be a lot of desktop users, which will impact kernel developers.
For now I will be working the stabilisation of kernel 2.6 and in a month or two I expect Fedora (the core of Red Hat Linux) to have a release with 2.6 so I expect to get more bug reports.
... »ý·« ...
|
|
|
À§·Î |
|
 |
|
|
»õ·Î¿î ÁÖÁ¦¸¦ ¿Ã¸± ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù ´ä±ÛÀ» ¿Ã¸± ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù ÁÖÁ¦¸¦ ¼öÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù ¿Ã¸° ±ÛÀ» »èÁ¦ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù ÅõÇ¥¸¦ ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|