½Ã½ºÅÛ°ü¸®ÀÚÀÇ ½°ÅÍ Ä¿ÇǴнº Ä¿ÇÇÇâÀÌ ³ª´Â *NIX
Ä¿ÇǴнº
½Ã½ºÅÛ/³×Æ®¿÷/º¸¾ÈÀ» ´Ù·ç´Â °÷
 FAQFAQ   °Ë»ö°Ë»ö   ¸â¹ö¸®½ºÆ®¸â¹ö¸®½ºÆ®   »ç¿ëÀÚ ±×·ì»ç¿ëÀÚ ±×·ì   »ç¿ëÀÚ µî·ÏÇϱâ»ç¿ëÀÚ µî·ÏÇϱâ 
 °³ÀÎ Á¤º¸°³ÀÎ Á¤º¸   ºñ°ø°³ ¸Þ½ÃÁö¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÏ·Á¸é ·Î±×ÀÎÇϽʽÿÀºñ°ø°³ ¸Þ½ÃÁö¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÏ·Á¸é ·Î±×ÀÎÇϽʽÿÀ   ·Î±×Àηα×ÀΠ

°¡ÀÔ¾øÀÌ ´©±¸³ª ±ÛÀ» ¾µ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. °øÁö»çÇ׿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ñ±Û±îÁöµµ..




BBS >> ¼³Ä¡, ¿î¿µ Q&A | ³×Æ®¿÷, º¸¾È Q&A | ÀÏ¹Ý Q&A || Á¤º¸¸¶´ç | AWS || ÀÚÀ¯°Ô½ÃÆÇ | ±¸Àα¸Á÷ || °øÁö»çÇ× | ÀÇ°ßÁ¦½Ã
Ä¿³Î 2.6.0 Á¤½Ä ÀÌ´Þ¸»¿¡. -test7 ¸±¸®Áî

 
±Û ¾²±â   ´äº¯ ´Þ±â    Ä¿ÇǴнº, ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¿£Áö´Ï¾îÀÇ ½°ÅÍ °Ô½ÃÆÇ À妽º -> *NIX / IT Á¤º¸
ÀÌÀü ÁÖÁ¦ º¸±â :: ´ÙÀ½ ÁÖÁ¦ º¸±â  
±Û¾´ÀÌ ¸Þ½ÃÁö
truefeel
Ä«Æä °ü¸®ÀÚ


°¡ÀÔ: 2003³â 7¿ù 24ÀÏ
¿Ã¸° ±Û: 1277
À§Ä¡: ´ëÇѹα¹

¿Ã¸®±â¿Ã·ÁÁü: 2003.10.09 ¸ñ, 4:31 pm    ÁÖÁ¦: Ä¿³Î 2.6.0 Á¤½Ä ÀÌ´Þ¸»¿¡. -test7 ¸±¸®Áî Àοë°ú ÇÔ²² ´äº¯

»õ·Î¿î ±â´É Ãß°¡º¸´Ù´Â ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» È®º¸Çؼ­
ÀÌ´Þ ¸»°æ¿¡ 2.6.0 Á¤½Ä¹öÀüÀ» ¹ßÇ¥ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»°Å¶ø´Ï´Ù.
Linus Torvalds °¡ Kernel Mailing ¿¡ ¹àÈù °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/08/2226253
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/965

Àοë:

The more interesting thing is that I and Andrew are trying to calm down
development, and I do _not_ want to see patches that don't fix a real and
clear bug. In other words, the "cleanup and janitorial" stuff is on hold,
and -test8 and then -test9 should be for _stability_ fixes only.

In other words, this should calm things down so that by the end of October
we can look at the state of 2.6.0 without having a lot of noise from "not
strictly necessary" stuff.


-test7ÀÌ ¹æ±ÝÀü¿¡ ¸±¸®ÁîµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.
s390, DVB, NFSv4, cpufreq, ACPI µîÀÌ ÁÖ¿ä ÆÐÄ¡ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
À§·Î
»ç¿ëÀÚ Á¤º¸ º¸±â ºñ¹Ð ¸Þ½ÃÁö º¸³»±â ±Û ¿Ã¸°ÀÌÀÇ À¥»çÀÌÆ® ¹æ¹®
ÀÌÀü ±Û Ç¥½Ã:   
±Û ¾²±â   ´äº¯ ´Þ±â    Ä¿ÇǴнº, ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¿£Áö´Ï¾îÀÇ ½°ÅÍ °Ô½ÃÆÇ À妽º -> *NIX / IT Á¤º¸ ½Ã°£´ë: GMT + 9 ½Ã°£(Çѱ¹)
ÆäÀÌÁö 1 Áß 1

 
°Ç³Ê¶Ù±â:  
»õ·Î¿î ÁÖÁ¦¸¦ ¿Ã¸± ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù
´ä±ÛÀ» ¿Ã¸± ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù
ÁÖÁ¦¸¦ ¼öÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù
¿Ã¸° ±ÛÀ» »èÁ¦ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù
ÅõÇ¥¸¦ ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group